Valerie Plame defends White House over exposing CIA station chief. She wrote a book accusing the Bush White House of treason for exposing her, even though she was not a covert agent so there was nothing to expose… and the White House didn’t expose her. Now, when the Obama White House exposes the CIA station chief in war-torn dangerous Afghanistan, she says, “Colossally stupid, but I think it was inadvertent.” A tour de force of hypocrisy and dishonesty.

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

6 November 2012 May 31, 2014 at 12:25 am

Liberals should stop mentioning Bush and the Bush era, otherwise the people will think more about how life was back then for them…

sa_rose May 30, 2014 at 4:32 pm

After all her pissing and moaning about her desk job being “outed?” What a bitch!

tincan53 May 30, 2014 at 11:58 am

Because ole Val is so in love with and trusting of this administration, maybe she should be the next ambassador to Libya.

deepthinker June 2, 2014 at 7:52 am

She should go out and conducting interviews in the public square.

Not so silent May 29, 2014 at 6:02 pm

She is getting her second batch of “15 minutes of fame”, and people are stupid enough to take a second bite as the asshole…..

danybhoy May 30, 2014 at 3:35 pm

Many of them just like her because she’s attractive, & that’s all she really has going for her at this point.

danybhoy May 30, 2014 at 3:35 pm

Many of them just like her because she’s attractive, & that’s all she really has going for her at this point.

deepthinker May 29, 2014 at 4:57 pm

After all her and her husbands bitching about being exposed and the “threats” they faced. She should have denounced the exposing of the agent. Guess there was no book offer or special favor in it for her and dumb ass husband Wilson.

Progressive Hemrrhoid May 29, 2014 at 2:54 pm

Hmmmm, makes one wonder how much the DNC paid her back in 2004 to come up with this little scandal?

Trickie May 29, 2014 at 2:30 pm
StrinaM May 29, 2014 at 1:20 pm

ANY sympathy I had for her is G. O. N. E.! How was it inadvertent when they were questioned about it, not once, but at least twice????

Where’s the special prosecutor? Where the hell is Ken Starr???

danybhoy May 29, 2014 at 12:39 pm
andre53 May 29, 2014 at 11:04 am

She’s absolutely right … and here’s the key … from her viewpoint.

So what exactly is her viewpoint?

Before any observation, thinking, analysis, is done and any conclusions are drawn, there is a fundamental truth that is as fundamental as it’s light when the sun shines, and dark at night.

Republicans/conservatives are evil and liberals/progressives are good.

Therefore, the question is never “what happened here, versus there?”

It’s like looking at the world wearing rose-colored glasses. You might very accurately describe the colors of something AS YOU SEE THEM. Of course, no one else sees that, but you really truly did not lie. But in her case, she does not know she is wearing those glasses.

So it’s “In what way was the Bush administration evil?” It’s a given that the motives were nefarious. There is no need to think about that. You might say, the science is settled. So all we need to determine is who knew what and when did they know it.

Libs are as pure as the wind-driven snow. Therefore, no need to question any motives. Whatever they do is, by definition, good. And if there is any perception ptherwise, then obviously someone made an honest mistake.

Sidekick May 29, 2014 at 12:28 pm

One can make that argument for everything the left does. And the left does if you see what I mean.

andre53 May 30, 2014 at 1:50 am

You’ll find this phenomena all around in life. People have these little (and sometimes big), mental short-circuits. The left happens to have some really big ones that have a huge influence on policy, therefore, our lives.

One you’ll find on the right, at least within the beltway, is the reliance on the press to “see” what is going on in the world. Of course we all to a great degree do that. But it’s one thing to say “now I know about the earthquake” after relying totally on the Media, and quite another to say “now I know what peoples’ opinions are” or “now I know what is happening in the economy of Main St” after reading the NY Times.

poppajoe49 May 29, 2014 at 9:18 pm

So what exactly is her viewpoint?

Apparently, it’s a narrow window from inside her sphincter.

andre53 May 30, 2014 at 1:52 am

It is narrow. Because all of these little fixed ideas and false data have one thing in common. They relieve you of the necessity of observing and thinking.

poppajoe49 May 30, 2014 at 1:55 pm

And I thought it was because she has her head up her ass!

andre53 June 1, 2014 at 7:47 am
Extirpates May 29, 2014 at 10:46 am

Again Duh “Air Head Meedia” got it wrong, she actually exposed herself!

poppajoe49 May 29, 2014 at 9:16 pm

WHAT? Where are the pictures? Call Playboy and have Hef release them now!

MGAP May 29, 2014 at 8:52 am

I was wondering how long it would take this ***t to pop up on the radar after this story broke.

JPTravis May 29, 2014 at 8:38 am

Apparently the LA Times came right out and baldly stated that Scooter Libby exposed Valerie Plame. A day later, they quietly retracted the claim:

Steve May 29, 2014 at 7:58 am

“A tour de force of hypocrisy and dishonesty.” This can be said for the last 5 years!

redabogado May 29, 2014 at 7:57 am

Ah yes, the stereotypical stupid blonde speaks……