Trump: ‘I Had Absolutely Nothing to Do With’ National Enquirer Story on Alleged Cruz Mistresses. Trump be like doing a Sergeant Schultz….I see nothing, I hear nothing, I know nothing.

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

coach March 26, 2016 at 6:12 am

Those that hate Trump and want so much to blame him for Cruz’s CUBAN MISTRESS CRISIS have to explain awy Jeff Roe his campaign manage being the one GQ says ordered the pictures of Trump’s wife, The Washington Times CONFIRMS at least 2 of the women’s involvement and Rubio offered the story to B’bart first AND that the whole story has been common knowledge in Washington for months. Finally there seems to be video of Cruz and a woman leaving a hotel on consecutive Tuesdays and Thursdays. Laugh at Trump if you want but he will will nomination and crush Clinton in November if the Democrats pas a law allowing her to run from prison. Want more? Reuters:Trump 54/37 in head to head over Cruz. keep laughing.

JPTravis March 26, 2016 at 6:36 am

It wasn’t the Washington Times, it was a columnist for the Washington Times, and this is what he said in total, all of it in one tweet: “From what I know, at least 2 of the women named as Cruz mistresses by the National Enquirer are accurate.”

What does that even mean? That he knows they had an affair with Cruz, or that he knows who they are and that there are rumors? And if he knows who they are and knows the allegations are true, why doesn’t he name them? Why hasn’t he written a column about it?

We already have two of the five angrily denying the story, and we know the Washington Times turned the story down when it was offered to them, so it seems odd to me that the Times would turn the story down–which means lack of evidence–if they have a columnist with any kind of proof about the story being true.

Big Al March 25, 2016 at 6:02 pm

Before it was the Enquirer Rubio had the story.

JPTravis March 25, 2016 at 5:10 pm

So Trump is claiming that he had no idea that his own campaign spokesperson was one of the women his only viable rival for the presidential nomination had an affair with, and had no idea that the Nat’l Enquirer, which he has a known association with, was going to print this story?

Anybody want to buy a bridge?

poppajoe49 March 25, 2016 at 6:23 pm

Can I put a toll booth on it?

KimmyQueen March 26, 2016 at 5:35 am

This story is politically nasty no matter if it is true or not…

poppajoe49 March 26, 2016 at 5:53 am

The point is, that Trump’s Campaign Spokesperson is one of the women they claim Cruz is having an affair with.
If it was true, it would have broken much sooner, and I personally find her repulsive. Almost as repulsive as Nomiki Konst.

KimmyQueen March 26, 2016 at 1:06 pm

What I don’t like is that he would have been okay with a person that supports him to have a tarnish reputation.

poppajoe49 March 25, 2016 at 2:39 pm
poppajoe49 March 25, 2016 at 2:22 pm
poppajoe49 March 25, 2016 at 1:36 pm


New York Magazine ran a piece in October, “Donald Trump’s Alliance with the National Enquirer,” which explained how a hit piece the publication did on Ben Carson came to be, as well as Donald Trump’s very close ties to the National Enquirer’s CEO David Pecker.

There’s lots more, check it out.

Progressive Hemrrhoid March 25, 2016 at 1:25 pm

Being this came from a mass media outlet, I’m betting this is a Klinton hit job.

Joe Redfield March 25, 2016 at 1:07 pm

If it wasn’t Trump then it was Her Majesty.

poppajoe49 March 25, 2016 at 1:03 pm

The only part of that I believe is “I know nothing.”.